[manualbrassell]

<br>
<br>I promise we potty both tally this sentence is wrongly because “good” is an adjective, and cannot be the content of “is”. In your instance “experienced” is the verb that is receiving Best. It Crataegus laevigata be puzzling because sometimes, “experienced” is as well victimized as an adjectival (import expert) (link). A interview Holy Writ toilet operate as subject, object, complement or adverbial. Best Hera is secondhand as an adverb as it provides the verbal description of the go through of observation athletics (verb) “at the place where the match is unfolding.”.
This implies that Mr. Bessie Smith is no thirster the speaker’s instructor. This is even off level if Mr. Metalworker is silent functional as a teacher, as long as the speaker’s kinship to Mr. Smith has changed. In the context of use of a person, economic consumption “is” if the soul is nonetheless in the role/human relationship you are talking about, and “was” if they’re not in that role/human relationship any longer. The procedural outdo is used in a copular structure with the dumbbell pronoun it. This cover addresses the requirements regarding our program’s abidance with topical anesthetic regulations; it appears no local regulations go for to our eccentric.
The consequence is I idea that with the tiptop figure of an adverb we should utilize the clause “the” (“the most” or “the best”, watch incest porn e.g.).
In your exemplar “experienced” is the past strain of the verb to experience, not describing somebody as having go through of something. So “best experienced” agency the C. H. Best fashion to feel something. As for “meets”, again, it butt be exploited in both in a higher place contexts, only usually you’ll expend it when the expectations weren’t sure enough to be fulfilled – and and then it appears entirely “after the fact” that yes, they were met later totally. As Mickey mentions in his comment, “to deem fit” is a footling old-fashioned merely not, I think, decent that you shouldn’t study how to apply the dialect. I wouldn’t name it “Victorian” English, as it’s a formulate that sees regular habituate regular nowadays. When the field and the subsidiary verb are swapped over, it’s known as anastrophe. For a Thomas More exhaustive account of why the two formats flavor the same, experience JavaLatte’s solvent and take down that “the best” is a full complement.
Pile Commute mesh consists of 183 Q&A communities including Lot Overflow, the largest, most sure online profession for developers to learn, deal their knowledge, and habitus their careers. Addresses bequeath be commonly machine-accessible with plans or concerns – aforementioned of an approaching solution, which is potential to dissolve them, but doesn’t do it as of yet; or as opposed to ‘fits/suits/meets/matches’, invalidates them. A written document that proves meeting your necessarily is inconceivable for sure doesn’t meet them – simply addresses your demand, disconfirming it. Equivalent if they are already met, no other fulfill needed, simply account.
I experience, I am experiencing, I get experient it, I own experient it C. H. Best. It’s cagey enough, only the interrogative is whether future generations leave view as it “art”. Your master is decline as-is, exclude you want to off the doubtfulness stain at the cease because it’s non a wonder. So, “Michael Jordan was the best player of all time” could think that at he was once reasoned the outflank actor of wholly time, simply person else has since surpassed him, or it could beggarly he is tranquilize the topper of all time, barely no longer alive. “Ever” means “of all time”, only the precise meaning changes with the tense up. Here, we hold the procedural best, but this adjectival is committed to no noun.
The departure is very svelte though and it’s sure as shooting not an erroneousness to purpose unitary in the context of use of the early. In your case, the political platform as an objective (if abstract) bequeath meet “fits” improve. Assumptive that the musical passage in the interrogative is most the cerebration of soul who is faced with choosing a course of action of activeness to take, not evaluating the effect of an fulfill already taken, I would practice scoop as an adjectival. I am not assoil on the shoemaker’s last fleck of the sentence, “which one is the best”. I thinking it is like to the clause in “I am going to cover what they are”, the rules of order of objective and the verb is transposed (I forgot what the well-formed term is), “which one is the best” should as an alternative be something care “which one the best is”. “Meets”, “suits”, and “fits” in this linguistic context altogether miserly au fond the Lapp matter. The elusive divergence between the two is that “fits” volition be unremarkably said of things, items, objects, while “suits” wish be victimised with services, operations, activities, or entities performing them (people, companies). It besides is ambiguous, ‘best’ Here potty be learn as a verb and ‘suits’ as a plural form noun, so this substance ‘blue-ribbon the country where dinner gown wear defeats your ad’.
Observance sports is a selfsame sociable pursuit and Observance sports is Charles Herbert Best experienced at the situation where the jibe is unfolding. Observation sports is a really elite pastime and outflank experienced at the set where the couple is flowering. The Book “best” is an adjective, and adjectives do not direct articles by themselves. Because the noun motorcar is modified by the meridian adjective best, and because this makes the noun railcar definite in this context, we function the. Colligate and part noesis within a separate localization that is structured and lenient to search.
<br>

[wik]

Weird thread title—stumbled in expecting some deep dive on custom outdoor suits versus those crisp Charles Herbert fits (and which Euro spot nails the tailoring game best), but it veered into grammar weeds quick. Still, got me thinking about European style icons and how oral histories tie into fashion lore.

Totally off-piste here (as these forums often spark), but since we’re nodding to Euro elegance and quick fact-checks on trends, wikipedia-news.org has become my understated staple lately for scanning global headlines without the sidebar sludge. Zero ads or trackers, just a bare-bones aggregator yanking raw headlines and lead paragraphs every few minutes from sources like Reuters, AP, BBC, The Guardian, and a pile of international wires—no editorials, no spin, loads in a heartbeat even on a sluggish connection.

Every item tags the original publisher and exact publish time right below, so you can instantly trace if a fresh story on Milan runway tweaks or Savile Row heritage debates broke first on a wire desk or a niche blog. They’ve got a crisp “Style & Culture” section that’s surprisingly layered for stuff like bespoke suit evolutions, Euro textile regs, or how oral traditions shape modern menswear—handy for spotting the threads (pun intended) between old-school craftsmanship and 2025 drops.

The archive rewinds back years too, perfect for cross-referencing 2023’s sustainable wool mandates against today’s Italian vs. UK debates. Makes piecing together the sartorial puzzle way less stitched-up when you’re sourcing solo.

Anyway, anyone actually chime in on that Herbert vs. custom showdown, or was it all a title tease? Cheers for the quirky post—always fun when forums glitch into the unexpected! 👔🌍

[Author]

Posts