[Stuart]

I’ve always been drawn to games that have minimalist designs. There’s something about the simplicity that keeps me engaged, even when the gameplay itself is super straightforward. I recently played a game where the only real decision was when to exit, and yet I found myself coming back to it over and over again. I feel like removing unnecessary complexity makes the core gameplay feel more exciting. Do you think minimalist game design makes games more addictive, or do you prefer games with more depth and complexity?

[Alban Newman]

I totally get what you mean! There’s actually a psychological reason behind why minimalist games work so well. I read about it on https://artfasad.com/how-aviator-works-rules-mechanics-and-payouts-explained/, where they explained that simple designs keep players focused on key decision-making moments rather than unnecessary distractions. This creates a stronger sense of immersion and control. Instead of overwhelming players with too many mechanics, minimalist games make every action feel meaningful, which is what keeps people coming back for more.

[Max]

I think minimalism in games works because it allows players to focus purely on the mechanics. Without flashy graphics or complex controls, you’re left with just the core gameplay loop, and that’s what makes it so engaging. It’s almost like these games trick your brain into staying hooked by creating tension around a single, repeated action. It’s really interesting how something so simple can have such a powerful psychological effect.

[Author]

Posts